A drill is more than a practice run: it is a chance to discover whether your plan works for the children, staff, and realities of your program. For practical guidance on emergency protocols, drills, documentation, and supporting children with additional needs, explore Stay Alert! Steps for Emergency Prep Buy Now $25.00; the course can help you strengthen your team’s preparedness and apply learning to daily practice. Keep reading for a focused review process that turns observations into concrete improvements.
When the drill ends, the most useful question is not simply, “Did everyone get outside?” It is, “Did the intended safety process work as planned, and what conditions helped or hindered it?” Looking at the whole system—including roles, information, equipment, routes, and children’s needs—helps a team improve without turning review into blame.
Young children rely on adults for movement, reassurance, communication, and reunification. A route that works for a walking preschool group may not work for infants, a child who uses mobility equipment, or a child who needs an individualized health plan. A drill can reveal these realities in a controlled setting, when the team has time to learn and adjust.
Federal early childhood preparedness guidance treats readiness as an ongoing process that includes preparation, response, and recovery. Likewise, exercise evaluation guidance emphasizes comparing observed performance with defined objectives, then assigning and tracking improvements. A timely review helps preserve details while staff still remember the experience.
This approach supports a stronger #safety culture and reassures staff that honest feedback is welcomed.
Before interpreting a drill, revisit its purpose. Was the goal to practice evacuation, sheltering, attendance accountability, family communication, or another capability? Clear, observable objectives make the review more useful than broad impressions such as “it went well.”
Ask whether the team performed the actions the plan expected, and what evidence supports that conclusion. Observers can note timestamps, movement, decisions, communication attempts, headcounts, and safety concerns. Separate what an observer directly saw from what a participant later explained. This distinction prevents assumptions from becoming findings.
Useful prompts include:
Invite staff to describe friction points in their own words. A blocked path, missing roster, or unclear cue may point to a process or resource issue rather than an individual’s mistake. Record strengths alongside gaps so the team knows which practices to preserve. FEMA’s exercise evaluation resources offer a structured approach to collecting evidence against objectives and using results in an after-action report.

A drill is only meaningful if it reflects the people actually present. Review whether infants and toddlers, children with disabilities, children with chronic medical conditions, and children who need communication or sensory support could participate safely. Consider staffing patterns, substitutes, volunteers, and children who arrive or leave at different times.
Ask practical, child-centered questions: Was there an assigned adult to move non-walking children? Could staff bring medications, health plans, mobility aids, and communication tools? Did the group have access to approved pickup information and emergency contacts after relocation? Were comfort and feeding needs considered if the scenario lasted longer than expected?
Use the answers to update individualized procedures, supply locations, and staff assignments. Coordinate with families and relevant specialists where appropriate, while protecting private information. The Child Care Technical Assistance Network’s emergency planning guidance highlights plans for evacuation, relocation, sheltering, reunification, and accommodation of children with additional needs.
Also reflect on emotional well-being. Did adult language remain calm and reassuring? Were children prepared in a developmentally appropriate way? If a child seemed distressed, what support helped? Practice should build confidence, not overwhelm. 馃Ц One valuable review question is: “What familiar object, routine, or adult support would help this child feel secure during a real disruption?”
In a real emergency, staff need to know where children are, who is responsible for them, and how families will receive accurate updates. After a drill, assess the entire information chain rather than assuming that a successful exit means everyone was accounted for.
Ask whether rosters were available in each classroom and whether attendance was checked at the planned stages: before movement, at the assembly or shelter location, and after any transition. Could staff access essential paper records if devices, internet, or power were unavailable? Were all staff and volunteers accounted for as well as children?
Review communication procedures with families and responders:
Written emergency plans should address family communication and safe reunification, including approved pickup information. Avoid sharing identifiable child information through unsecured channels. State requirements vary - check your state licensing agency for applicable drill, recordkeeping, communication, and reunification rules. Refresh family contact details routinely, not only after an exercise reveals an outdated number.
A hot wash—a brief discussion soon after the drill—captures participants’ immediate reactions. It is not the same as a complete analysis. Validate observations, compare results with objectives, identify contributing conditions, and decide what change will address each gap. For example, if a roster was slow to retrieve, ask whether its storage location, assigned carrier, or backup procedure caused the delay.
For each improvement, document:
Prioritize actions that affect immediate safety, accessibility, accountability, or compliance. Update written procedures and classroom quick-reference sheets, then communicate changes to every shift and substitute. Keep the plan current when staff, rooms, equipment, or community risks change. FEMA improvement-planning guidance stresses that corrective actions should be monitored and implemented over time—not simply listed in a report.
For deeper preparation across emergency types, planning, and response, consider Emergency and Disaster Preparedness – Online Buy Now $55.00. If your team wants focused support developing procedures and communication systems, Creating an Emergency and Disaster Preparedness Plan
Buy Now $16.00 is another relevant course option.
Some after-action reviews create paperwork without changing practice. Others focus on speed or individual performance while missing weaknesses in the plan itself. A constructive review stays focused on evidence, children’s needs, and improvements the program can actually implement.
Also avoid turning a drill into a realistic surprise that may frighten young children or staff. Follow the program’s safety limits and stop or pause procedures. A real emergency always takes priority over exercise activity. If a real incident occurs during practice, use the actual emergency plan and approved signals, then document the interruption accurately.
After a child care drill, ask whether the objectives were met, whether every child and staff member could follow the plan, whether communication and accountability worked, and what specific changes will close identified gaps. A useful review recognizes strengths while documenting evidence and system-level barriers. The aim is not a perfect drill; it is a safer, more reliable response next time.
Capture findings promptly, assign each corrective action to an owner, and verify completion through follow-up practice or review. Keep procedures accessible, account for individual needs, and involve staff and families in appropriate updates. The cycle of practice, evaluation, improvement, and retesting turns a drill into meaningful #preparedness—and helps your team protect children with greater clarity and confidence.
Additional relevant ChildCareEd courses: