One thoughtful adjustment can help a child participate more fully in a classroom routine, and coaching can give a teacher the support to try it with confidence. Use the Daycare Teacher Goal-Setting & Action Plan Template Buy Now $0.99 to agree on a specific participation goal, choose a manageable first step, and set a target date. Together, decide what to observe and when to discuss how the change is working for the child. For guidance on connecting inclusive strategies with coaching and collaboration, explore Coaching for Success: Inclusive Strategies to Support Children with Autism Buy Now
$55.00$45.00. Read on for a focused process you can adapt to one real classroom goal.
Inclusive practice is not a special event added after the lesson plan is complete. It is the ongoing work of noticing who can participate, identifying barriers, and adjusting the environment, materials, interaction, or routine so every child has meaningful access. When a teacher is asked to change many practices at once, the goal can feel abstract and burdensome. A single, observable change gives the educator a manageable place to begin.
Coaching makes professional learning more relevant when it occurs in the setting where the practice will be used. A systematic review of early childhood coaching found positive effects on teacher knowledge and instructional competence, alongside a range of child developmental outcomes; the review also emphasized the value of situated learning in real teaching contexts. The TIES roadmap similarly describes a cycle of pre-meeting, observation, modeling, feedback, reflection, and goal-setting for inclusive practices.
Consider a familiar example: during group story time, one child rarely joins in. Rather than assume a lack of interest or readiness, the teacher and coach can examine whether the child has a way to communicate, see materials, move comfortably, or participate without speaking. The focus is on access and strengths—not on making every child respond in the same way.
Begin with the teacher’s perspective and a specific routine. Ask what feels challenging and which part of the day they would most like to make more accessible. The goal should matter to the educator and connect to a child’s participation, independence, communication, or peer connection. Keep the child’s strengths and interests central; inclusion is not a project of fixing a child.
Observe before deciding. A short, focused observation can reveal details that a general impression misses: who handles the materials, who gets a turn, how directions are offered, and what happens when a child signals a need. Describe what you see in neutral, observable language. For example, “During the song, the teacher gave three spoken directions; the child watched but did not have a visual cue or instrument” is more useful than “The child would not participate.”
Then select one small adjustment and define what success could look like. For story time, the teacher might offer a picture choice between two books, provide a prop for the child to hold, or invite the child to turn a page with a peer. These options are purposeful adaptations, not a guarantee that a child will respond in a particular way.
Stay open to family knowledge and, where appropriate, specialist input. A family may know a familiar gesture or phrase that helps a child engage. Adaptations should fit the individual context rather than rely on assumptions or diagnosis alone.
Teachers are more likely to experiment when coaching feels like shared problem-solving rather than an inspection. Start with permission and curiosity: “Would it be helpful if we looked together at one moment during story time?” Acknowledge existing strengths before discussing a next step. The coach’s role is to build the teacher’s capacity—not simply deliver the answer.
Listen carefully to what makes the change easier or harder. The teacher may have limited planning time, uncertainty about the child’s communication, or concerns about how a new material will fit the group routine. These are practical conditions to address, not evidence of a lack of commitment. Agree on support that fits the teacher’s learning preference: modeling, co-planning, rehearsal, a visual reminder, or a brief co-teaching opportunity.
Use a collaborative goal with a clear action, context, and review point. For example: “During the next three story times this week, offer the child a choice of a prop or page-turning role, then note which option the child uses or declines.” This leaves room for the child’s communication and choice while giving the coach and teacher something specific to reflect on.
Trust grows when the coach respects the teacher’s expertise and follows through on agreed support. Short, consistent conversations are often more realistic than occasional long meetings in a busy child care setting.
Translate the chosen strategy into the actual routine. A plan should make clear what the teacher will prepare, what they will do in the moment, and how children can participate in different ways. If the goal is to broaden participation during story time, preparation might include a prop, a picture choice, and a spot where the child can see the book comfortably. Avoid adding so many materials or steps that the plan becomes hard to sustain.

Model only what is useful, explaining the reason behind the move. The coach might demonstrate offering a prop and waiting, then narrate: “I’m giving time for the child to look, reach, gesture, or decline before I prompt again.” The teacher can rehearse the wording or sequence in a low-pressure moment. If appropriate, co-teach once and then invite the teacher to lead while the coach observes.
Make the adaptation part of the shared activity rather than a separate task that isolates the child. Peers might also choose props, point to pictures, or take turns turning pages. This helps normalize varied ways of joining in while preserving the child’s individual choices.
Keep family communication collaborative and respectful. Share what the team is trying and invite relevant insight, following program privacy practices and family preferences. State requirements vary—check your state licensing agency when questions about formal obligations arise.
Measurement should help the teacher and coach understand whether the strategy is becoming usable, not assign a score to the teacher or child. Before trying the change, agree on a simple indicator connected to the goal. In the story-time example, you might record whether the child had an accessible way to participate and what the child did in response, including choosing not to join at that moment.
Use brief, objective notes during comparable routines. Record the context, the teacher’s action, and the child’s observable response. Avoid interpreting intent: “Child touched the prop and watched the next page” is more informative than “Child liked the activity.” The teacher’s reflection adds important context, such as whether the prop was familiar or the group was unusually noisy.
Review evidence together after a few opportunities. Look for patterns, barriers, and small wins. A strategy may need adjustment if materials are hard to reach, the routine moves too quickly, or the child has another preferred way to communicate. A positive coaching conversation alone does not establish that practice changed; repeated observation and reflection help show what is happening in the classroom.
Avoid changing several variables at once or treating a single observation as a verdict. Coaching is iterative: evidence informs the next adjustment, and the process continues with empathy and professional judgment.
At the end of the cycle, recognize the teacher’s effort and the specific evidence of progress. Progress may mean that the teacher prepared an accessible choice, offered it consistently, or noticed a child’s communication more accurately—even if the child’s participation varied. Naming these concrete steps reinforces professional learning without promising a particular outcome.
Decide together whether to continue the strategy, refine it, or transfer the learning to another routine. If the adaptation is helping, the teacher may explore a similar access option during art or outdoor play. If it is not working as expected, return to observation and ask what barrier remains. The next move might be to change the material, adjust timing, seek family perspective, or collaborate with a specialist with appropriate consent.
Directors can support sustainability by protecting a small amount of planning and reflection time, making relevant materials accessible, and helping staff coordinate across shifts. Share successful approaches with colleagues only with the teacher’s agreement and without sharing unnecessary child information. Program-level consistency should offer a dependable foundation while leaving room for individualized supports.
Inclusion becomes durable through repeated, ordinary decisions that help children belong in everyday routines. One small change can become a starting point for stronger teamwork and more responsive classroom practice.
To coach a teacher through one inclusive classroom change, begin with a meaningful routine and observe before selecting a strategy. Partner with the teacher to define a small, strengths-based goal; model or rehearse the change; and use brief, objective evidence to reflect and adjust. Respect the child’s choices, invite family knowledge where appropriate, and address practical barriers that make implementation difficult.
The central lesson is simple: a focused change, supported through trust and follow-up, can make participation more accessible without asking one teacher to transform everything at once. Keep the work collaborative, specific, and grounded in what children and educators show you each day.
Related ChildCareEd courses: Building Equity: Inclusionary Practices in Preschool Buy Now $10.00; Inclusive Lessons for Preschoolers
Buy Now $16.00; Coaching and Mentoring Techniques
Buy Now $16.00; Staff Supervision, Observation & Feedback
Buy Now $10.00; Family Voices Matter: Tools for Meaningful Collaboration
Buy Now $55.00.