People all experience and learn about the world differently, and this is especially true of children. Educators need to be aware of the different learning styles and how to plan instruction around them. For practical strategies and professional development, consider the courses Play, Learn, Grow Buy Now $16.00 and Planning for Every Child: Responsive Strategies in Action
Buy Now $55.00, which offer evidence-informed approaches to differentiate instruction.
Learning styles and preferences take on a variety of forms. Most learners align with the following styles:
Large, methodologically rigorous reviews conclude that the simple practice of matching instruction to a learner's self-reported style (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) has not been shown to produce reliably better learning outcomes. A major synthesis published in Psychological Science in the Public Interest noted that many studies supporting learning-style claims fail to meet rigorous experimental standards; the best-quality evidence does not validate the hypothesis that tailoring modality to preference improves retention or transfer. (Psychological Science summary). Practitioner-oriented reviews trace the VARK origins and observe that preferences exist but instructional matching demonstrates limited effectiveness in controlled studies (WGU summary).
Given the limited empirical support for the matching hypothesis, early childhood educators should design lessons that are multimodal and scaffold cognitive processes rather than rely on a single presumed preference. Multimodal instruction supports encoding through multiple representational formats, increases opportunities for retrieval, and lowers access barriers for children with diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds.
Evidence-informed, classroom-ready strategies include:
For curriculum planning that operationalizes these strategies, see the childcareed course Planning for Every Child: Responsive Strategies in Action Buy Now $55.00 and the course Creating Engaging and Meaningful Learning Experiences
Buy Now $55.00.
Assessment in early childhood is most effective when it is authentic, ongoing, and context-informed. Use brief observational notes, work samples, and family interviews to document how a child engages with materials and peers. Calibration across the program (shared observation forms, team review of samples) helps ensure reliable interpretation. See How Teachers Support Children’s Growth and Development for approaches to align assessment with instruction and How Can We Support the Quiet Child's Strengths for strategies to observe less-verbal learners.
Activity examples that integrate multiple modalities:
Plan each learning objective with at least two modalities in mind, use short formative checks (picture exit slips, one-minute retell) to confirm understanding, rotate center emphases to refresh exposure, and share approaches with families to reinforce multimodal learning at home.
It is important to determine how a child learns best so they are able to connect with the topics you’re teaching, as well as participate with the rest of the class.
Related articles: How Teachers Support Children’s Growth and Development | How Can We Support the Quiet Child's Strengths | What Is Visual Learning… | Why Open-Ended Art Matters… | How can I use STEM activities… | Why Is Repeating Favorite Books…
Interested in learning more about Learning Styles and how to support them in the classroom? Visit H&H Child Care Training Center and register for one of these courses today.
Short answer: children may show modality preferences, but rigorous research does not support teaching exclusively in a matched modality as a reliable way to improve learning outcomes. Large methodologically rigorous reviews conclude that the common practice of matching instruction to a child's self-reported style (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) has not been shown to produce consistently better retention or transfer of learning. The major synthesis summarized by the Association for Psychological Science provides a clear overview of these limitations (Psychological Science summary), and practitioner summaries trace VARK origins while cautioning against overreliance on matching (WGU summary).
What to do instead: prioritize universal design and multimodal routines that simultaneously support visual, auditory, and kinesthetic access. Practical steps classroom teams can adopt this week include:
For teams seeking structured curriculum guidance that integrates multimodal scaffolds and responsive planning, the course "From Play to Planning: Building Culturally Competent, Child-Centered Curriculum" offers concrete ways to operationalize these practices in lesson plans and routines. Register for practical tools and templates: From Play to Planning Buy Now
$55.00$40.00.
This approach balances respect for individual engagement patterns with teaching practices that are evidence-aligned, maximizing access and depth of learning for young children. (References: Psychological Science summary; WGU summary.)
Contemporary evidence cautions against rigidly grouping children by a single 'learning style' and teaching only in that modality. Instead, embed multimodal design, scaffold language and concept development, use authentic observation to guide instruction, and provide multiple ways to demonstrate learning. These practices increase access and foster deeper learning for young children. For professional development that operationalizes these practices, consider the courses linked above.
Use these quick implementation prompts in your next planning cycle: design each objective with two or more modalities, add one movement-based reinforcement to each week’s lesson, and document one formative sample per child each week to guide next steps.